monit-general
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "check now" command


From: SZÉPE Viktor
Subject: Re: "check now" command
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:29:53 +0200
User-agent: Horde Application Framework 5

Thank you.

While doing "monit validate" I've received as many alert emails as there are checks.
Can we do something about it?


Idézem/Quoting address@hidden:

Hi,

you can use "monit validate" to trigger the monitoring cycle and collect status.

The "check program" will have however one cycle delay, as monit currently collects the result the next cycle after the program is executed (to not block other tests).

Best regards,
Martin


On 31 Jul 2018, at 10:31, SZÉPE Viktor <address@hidden> wrote:

Usually I need "check now" when I am debugging an unknown problem.

Idézem/Quoting Guillaume François <address@hidden>:

I would prefer something like:
check every 5 cycles when ok
check every 2 cycles when failling

check for quick recovery

or the way around (prefer to remove as fast as possible problematic server
from pool)

check every 1 cycle when ok
check every 10 cycle when failing


Currently this kind of thing can be achieve with two  excluding checks  and
enabling the other when "failling")





Le mar. 31 juil. 2018 à 09:09, Roose, Marco <address@hidden> a
écrit :

I very much like that idea!

Kind regards,
Marco Roose


-----Original Message-----
From: monit-general <monit-general-bounces+marco.roose=
address@hidden> On Behalf Of SZÉPE Viktor
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2018 10:29 PM
To: monit-general <address@hidden>
Subject: "check now" command

Hello!

I am a happy monit user.

Sometime I face a situation when a check has a temporary problem.

 # Number of resolvers
 check program network_resolv
    with path "/usr/local/sbin/server-integrity.sh -c RES -r 3" every
33 cycles
   group integrity
   if status != 0 then alert

So if it goes to "failed" status it would be nice to have a dedicated
"check now" command that would evaluate the status of the check again.
Work-arounds may exist but I am looking for a straight-forwards solution.
(currently I issue monit reload for that with is not optimal)

Thanks!


SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
--
ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  address@hidden  skype: szepe.viktor
Budapest, III. kerület






--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general



--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/IT d(+) s++:- a C++$ ULC(+)>+++$ !P--- L+>$ !E---? W+++$ !N* !o-- K--?
w(+) !O---? !M- !V--? PS+? !PE Y+ PGP++>+++ !t-- !5 !X- R(+)>++* tv-? b(-)
DI !D- G(+)>+ e+++ h--() r->$ y?*
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------



SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
--
ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  address@hidden  skype: szepe.viktor
Budapest, III. kerület






--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general


--
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general



SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
https://github.com/szepeviktor/debian-server-tools/blob/master/CV.md
--
ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  address@hidden  skype: szepe.viktor
Budapest, III. kerület








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]