Re: monitoring network filesystem

[Martin Pala]

I Agree, will change it to Aleksander's syntax.

I have used the 'if failed' just to keep the common test declaration syntax, 
even though with 'existence' test it looked strange.


On Jul 9, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:

> On 9. juli 2010, at 17.42, Martin Pala wrote:
> 
>>   check file with path /path/to/netfs/lost+found
>>      if failed existence for 5 cycles then exec "/path/to/scripts/mount.sh"
> 
> 
> I must say I like Aleksander's "if does not exist" version much better than; 
> "if failed existence" which sounds like an excerpt from Nietzsche's work on 
> existentialism.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Aleksander Kamenik wrote:
>> 
>>> Something like this would be perfect (I don't care about content, so the 
>>> lost+found folder is a great choice in my case):
>>> 
>>> check folder lost+found path /path/to/netfs/lost+found
>>> if does not exist then exec "/path/to/scripts/mount.sh"
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general