[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: FYI |
Date: |
28 Jun 2002 21:40:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service) |
Hehe, using two competing mailing lists is fun. Lets stick to
address@hidden shall we :)
"Martin Pala" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rory Toma" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:05 AM
> Subject: Re: FYI
>
> > I suppose we could allow both interface and specific
> > hostnames/addresses. One needs the interface so you can specify eth0,
> > vpn0, etc in the config file for the case of dynamic addressing.
> >
> > so you'd have:
> > set httpd port 2812
> > interface eth0
> > address 172.17.1.1
> > allow...
>
> I think that it could be better to allow both types of interfaces to be
> defined by the same directive (for example 'interface'). It keeps the monit
> dictionary simpler for similar purpose. What do you think about it?
I second that
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- Re: FYI, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/06/27
- Re: FYI,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=
- Re: FYI, Rory Toma, 2002/06/28
- Re: FYI, Rory Toma, 2002/06/28
- Re: FYI, Rory Toma, 2002/06/28
- Re: FYI, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/06/28
- Re: FYI, Rory Toma, 2002/06/28
- Re: FYI, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2002/06/28