[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: monit STATUS
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: monit STATUS |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:56:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service, linux) |
Martin Pala <address@hidden> writes:
> update the plann by some topics - it was partialy discussed on the list
1)
Okay, this was a good suggestion:
if failed checksum then unmonitor
If you can do this I agree that this is a good solution for checksum++.
2)
- Timeout statement will be extended to provide generic framework
for error ratio driven timeout.
I'm not sure it's worth the work, because it's only start and restart
that is interesting, or?
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- monit STATUS, Martin Pala, 2003/08/26
- Re: monit STATUS,
Jan-Henrik Haukeland <=