[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SIGSEGV problem
From: |
Jan-Henrik Haukeland |
Subject: |
Re: SIGSEGV problem |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:33:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service, linux) |
Christian Hopp <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Jan-Henrik Haukeland wrote:
>
>>
>> I ran a fast test with efence and managed to reproduce the SIGSEGV (it
>> may be more). SIGSEGV is thrown in process/common.c:connectchild()
>> from this line:
>>
>> parent->children[parent->children_num - 1] = (struct myprocesstree *) child;
*
> I gonna have a look at it. (-:
Great, btw, did you have time to look at the line number problem
caused by the DEPEND_COND sub-condition in the lexer as well? If not I
can try to look at it when I get back later this evening.
>> BTW, Christian why do you use cast in this code!? I'm thinking about
>> stuff like (struct myprocesstree ..) It is *not* necessary.
>
> because it usually does not harm either.
IMHO stuff like this adds cruft to the code and is orthogonal to the
"keep it as simple as possible" principle :) Pretty please, with sugar
on the top, remove it, and also any similar redundant cast code :-)
--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
- SIGSEGV problem, Martin Pala, 2003/08/13
- Re: SIGSEGV problem, Martin Pala, 2003/08/13
- Re: SIGSEGV problem, Christian Hopp, 2003/08/14
- Re: SIGSEGV problem, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/08/14
- Re: SIGSEGV problem, Martin Pala, 2003/08/15
- Re: SIGSEGV problem, Martin Pala, 2003/08/15
Re: SIGSEGV problem, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/08/13