[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?
From: |
Oliver Jehle |
Subject: |
Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous? |
Date: |
30 Jan 2003 13:57:18 +0100 |
its only to have it backward compatible...
not to change the scripts to use the -f option... so i think its
mandatory to have it configured in monitrc..... --> if a user needs the
-f to reduce the risk, then he can activate it in the config file... or
in the general config file ....
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 13:40, Christian Hopp wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Oliver Jehle wrote:
>
> > sounds good...
> >
> > but i think, to have it easy in scripts to use the monit command, the
> > set forceactions=[yes|no] option in monitrc is mandatory....
>
> I use it in scripts and but also on cli. That's why I have thought of a
> "-f" (--force) option.
>
> Christian
- "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?, Christian Hopp, 2003/01/30
- Re: "monit stop" and "monit restart" too dangerous?, Oliver Jehle, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, rory, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Martin Pala, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Christian Hopp, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Martin Pala, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Rory Toma, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Jan-Henrik Haukeland, 2003/01/30
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Christian Hopp, 2003/01/31
- Re: 'monit stop' and 'monit restart' too dangerous?, Martin Pala, 2003/01/31