[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-bugs] [ 100564 ] Download priorities.
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-bugs] [ 100564 ] Download priorities. |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 10:49:42 -0500 |
Support Request #100564, was updated on 2002-Mar-10 22:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=100564&group_id=1409
Category: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Summary: Download priorities.
By: Arker
Date: 2002-Oct-24 10:17
Logged In: NO
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016
I am a programmer occasionally, in small ways, so hopefully
I have at least a little more technical way of seeing this.
I think nils. and robert are both on the right track.
Dropping packets is a nono, but priorities should determine
where effort is concentrated. In particular, we have a
limited number of connections available at any given time,
which can be used to download or to search, no? So reserve
some of them for high priority files that we don't have
active sources for, to continue searching for them. I could
be misunderstanding how the program currently works, but it
seems that when I have a high-availability file in que it
will eat all of the available connections to download it as
fast as possible, and nothing gets done on the rarer files
that we don't have sources for. What we would like to see is
for that to be mitigated somewhat by priorities, so for
instance if I am looking for a low priority high
availability file, and several rarer files I've set to high
priority, the high availability files can only use a limited
number of connections and the rest are being used to search
for those hard to find sources that have my high priority
files. Hopefully this helps. I'd really like to see this
feature implemented properly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By: nils.lichtenfeld
Date: 2002-Jul-15 08:49
Logged In: NO
Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 2000) Opera 6.04 [en]
I dont think it is a good idea to drop packets.. its wasted Bandwidth for
both sides.
I would implement priorities like this:
A file with
high priority gets seached for more often. A file with low priority less
often. That might boost the high priority ones a little.
Greetings,
Nils
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=100564&group_id=1409
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Mldonkey-bugs] [ 100564 ] Download priorities.,
nobody <=