[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-bugs] [Bug #1579] RFC 1918 IPs + Reserved IPs + DoD IPs in Ser
From: |
nobody |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-bugs] [Bug #1579] RFC 1918 IPs + Reserved IPs + DoD IPs in Serverlist |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Nov 2002 06:09:42 -0500 |
=================== BUG #1579: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=1579&group_id=1409
Changes by: Anonymous user Date: 2002-Nov-03 06:09
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Obviously, what is required is a generic "list of netmasks to ban", so that
users can add custom netmasks...
=================== BUG #1579: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
Submitted by: None Project: mldonkey, a free e-Donkey
client
Submitted on: 2002-Nov-02 00:17
Category: Core Severity: 5 - Major
Bug Group: None Resolution: None
Assigned to: None Status: Open
Release: 2.00 Release:
Platform Version: Linux i386-i686 Binaries Origin: Downloaded from
Savannah
Summary: RFC 1918 IPs + Reserved IPs + DoD IPs in Serverlist
Original Submission: The RFC 1918 IPs
(http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1918.html)
are in the Server List
But there shouldn't.
I just discovered that those clowns uses Reserved Addresses too. Ask whois
1.0.0.0 - 1.255.255.255 (1.0.0.0/8)
2.0.0.0 - 2.255.255.255 (2.0.0.0/8)
5.0.0.0 - 5.255.255.255 (5.0.0.0/8)
70.0.0.0 - 79.255.255.255 (70.0.0.0/7, 72.0.0.0/5)
82.0.0.0 - 95.255.255.255 (82.0.0.0/7, 84.0.0.0/6,
88.0.0.0/5)
96.0.0.0 - 126.255.255.255 ( 96.0.0.0/4, 112.0.0.0/5,
120.0.0.0/6, 124.0.0.0/7,
126.0.0.0/8)
222.0.0.0 - 223.255.255.255 (222.0.0.0/7)
127.0.0.2 - 127.255.255.255
And (of course) the always liked DoD Addresses !!
U.S. Army Yuma Proving Ground: (will not be routed)
6.0.0.0 - 6.255.255.255 (6.0.0.0/8)
Defense Information Systems Agency: (will not be routed)
7.0.0.0 - 7.255.255.255 (7.0.0.0/8)
Defense Intelligence Agency: (will not be routed)
11.0.0.0 - 11.255.255.255 11.0.0.0/8
I apologise for this third posting, but those Server Guys are realy Clowns.
It's only a wast of time and resources dealing with them.
Ayn
Follow-up Comments
*******************
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2002-Nov-03 06:09 By: None
Obviously, what is required is a generic "list of netmasks to ban", so that
users can add custom netmasks...
CC list is empty
No files currently attached
For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=1579&group_id=1409