On 7 June 2010 13:10, Volker Grabsch wrote:
Doug Semler schrieb:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01034.html
Thanks for the hint. This discussion essentially ends with the
following posting:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01114.html
where Ozkan Sezer proposed the following patch, which is quite
similar to the GCC-part of Mark Brand's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01114/ginclude.diff
This happened 3 months before the GCC 4.5 release, so obviously
it wasn't accepted. Does anyone know what was wrong with it?
To the GCC maintainers: Would you accept the patch if MinGW-RT
includes the other patch?
To the MinGW-RT maintainers: Would you accept the patch if GCC
includes the other patch?
I have no issue with the patch from a MinGW-RT perspective as long as
there are no negative impacts.
Chris