[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Boost library naming
From: |
Volker Grabsch |
Subject: |
Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Boost library naming |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:20:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Joost Kraaijeveld <address@hidden> schrieb:
> I noticed that the library naming for Boost is aligned with the naming
> convention on my Debian machine. More in particular, it does not follow
> the convention as presented here:
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/more/getting_started/unix-variants.html#library-naming
>
> Is there a reason for this, can I (or the maintainer of the Boost cross
> compilation?) change that, and id so, should I change that?
I have been told that the "tagged" layout of Boost makes the library
easier to use, thus the src/boost.mk script calls "bjam" with the option:
--layout=tagged
Question to all others on this list who are using Boost:
Is this option still desirable?
If it isn't, what layout should we use instead?
Greets,
Volker
--
Volker Grabsch
---<<(())>>---
Administrator
NotJustHosting GbR
- Re: [Mingw-cross-env-list] Boost library naming,
Volker Grabsch <=