[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GMG-Devel] Replace tarnsifex in mediagoblin?
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: [GMG-Devel] Replace tarnsifex in mediagoblin? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:55:37 -0500 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.9.6pre2; emacs 24.3.1 |
address@hidden writes:
> address@hidden writes:
>
>> On 2014-08-07
>> vlado <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>> In my opinion it's not appropriate to force me to use centralized
>>> translation solution (transifex) with what is effectively
>>> decentralized social media system. Is there any way to use local
>>> translation?
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> Vladimir:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I have been translating various free software packages and I must say I
>> agree.
>> Transifex allows you to download and upload a PO file, but IIRC you need to
>> run
>> nonfree JS in your web browser for this to work. I also tried using the `tx`
>> program once, but for a reason I don't remember it failed. The point is,
>> regardless of technical terms Transifex is proprietary and centralized.
>>
>> I recently decided to stop looking for workarounds and just ask project
>> developers to push PO files directly to Git, but large projects don't do that
>> (and it's much more complicated than using translator-friendly tools) and
>> then
>> I miss many projects I would otherwise like to translate.
>>
>> The best solution I know is running a local Pootle server as part of the
>> project, e.g. at a subdomain of the project website. No centralized service
>> dependency and full support for PO files, including download and upload.
>>
>>
>> Just a personal feeling, anyway. If any of my projects ever needs a
>> translation
>> server, I'll use a locally installed one because that's the best (maybe
>> nearly
>> the only) way to actively support decentralization and community
>> sustainability.
>
> Heya,
>
> Sorry about taking so long to reply to this thread.
>
> Transifex was not originally proprietary when we started to use it... it
> was free software, GPLv2, and python based. We were also using it at
> Creative Commons when I worked there, and it was well liked.
>
> https://github.com/transifex/transifex still has the old free software
> codebase. Unfortunately it is no longer maintained, and Transifex went
> proprietary, and we weren't aware... it slipped under my radar. I
> hadn't realized it until they sent me an email mentioning that they were
> excited to be patenting their Transifex Live system, which lead to a
> "WTF?" moment. Until that moment, I thought Transifex was still free
> software.
>
> We'll be moving to something else, but I am a bit overloaded, and weo
> need to get 0.7.0 out the door along with rewards. After that I'll be
> looking at moving us over.
>
> Yes, MediaGoblin relying on proprietary software is unacceptable. We
> didn't realize it was happening because that rug was pulled out of our
> feet while we were still standing on it.
>
> If someone wants to volunteer to help with the move, we'll probably
> either be moving to WikiTranslate or Pootle.
>
> Thanks!
> - Chris
You can follow along here, by the way.
https://issues.mediagoblin.org/ticket/913