[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Generate pot and po's

From: Hakan Tandogan
Subject: Re: [Maposmatic-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Generate pot and po's
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:08:58 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 11.01.2013 08:59, Guttorm Flatabø wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Hakan Tandogan <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:

    Actually, would you mind leaving the pot regeneration until the
    language simplification patches I sent earlier this week are
    committed? I'd think that way we would have a more consistent hitory
    in the source tree.

Maintainers can feel free to not accept the patch and generate the
gettext files themselves. Is it perhaps a unclear maintainer hierarchy
that is the reason behind them not being merged? It didn't occur to me
that they weren't, what's holding them back?

I believe Maxime was waiting for me to make certain that the nl_NL to nl change does not require any further changes in the . Unfortunately, with real life work load being what it is, I did not get around to set up and run my own server in the last few days.

If no objections have surfaced yet I'd say you should feel free to merge
yourself. You can merge your patches first, then merge my copyright
patch, then pull from transifex, generate gettext files, and push to
transifex, and simply leave my gettext patch.

@Maxime: Could you please go ahead with the push, or should I do it myself? I am pretty confident that I did not break too much :-)

Alternatively, as Guttorm suggested, I could the push myself as well and then continue the transifex work.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]