[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more built-in functions, make shell
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: more built-in functions, make shell |
|
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:58:06 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:41:08 +0000
> From: "Earnie Boyd" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
>
> I see the benefits but I don't know if the benefits outway the
> headaches it might cause.
What headaches are those? If the implementation is compatible with
Bourne shell, it will work as if you had a shell installed. I don't
see any headaches here.
- more built-in functions, make shell, Jonathan Baccash, 2005/07/02
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Earnie Boyd, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Earnie Boyd, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Earnie Boyd, 2005/07/03
- Re: more built-in functions, make shell, Paul D. Smith, 2005/07/03