Re: [Lynx-dev] "invalid cookie path", Re: redirection loop

[Karen Lewellen]

I must not be understanding this problem, because I reach google several 
times  a day without meeting this error.
granted I am using a Linux shell, but my google cookies still work.
Karen



On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> I was told the only machines google cookies will work on and the only
> machines google is interested in are windows machines.  We do have power
> users running lynx on windows, but I suspect for those of us using Mac's
> and Linux those are just best disabled.
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Bela Lubkin wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 03:37:07
> > From: Bela Lubkin <address@hidden>
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] "invalid cookie path", Re: redirection loop
> >
> > Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 01:59:39AM -0700, Bela Lubkin wrote:
> > > > RFC 6265 obsoleted RFC 2965 in 2011; it says:
> > >
> > > sure - that's
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820485
> > >
> > > If you have time to work on this, I'll review/etc a patch.
> > > Otherwise, I'll eventually get around to it.
> >
> > Debbug 820485 is actually about other differences between Lynx behavior
> > and RFC 6265 (i.e.: whether cookies are indexed by host port or not --
> > 6265 says not).  It would potentially be reasonable to *act* on the bug
> > report as if it broadly said 'Lynx is not RFC 6265 compatible', and fix
> > everything that could be found.
> >
> > I don't intend to work on any aspect of it.
> >
> > > Bela<
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Lynx-dev mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev