lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7


From: Thomas Dickey
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:22:24 -0500 (EST)

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Thorsten Glaser" <address@hidden>
| Cc: address@hidden
| Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 8:59:20 PM
| Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] ANN: lynx2.8.9dev.7
| 
| Thomas Dickey dixit…
| >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:18:35AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
| 
| >> P.S.: You seem to have signed Lynx releases with the GPG key
| >> 5DDF8FB7688E31A6 in the past, but this release is signed with
| >> 702353E0F7E48EDB. While 5DDF8FB7688E31A6 has a signature from
| >> 702353E0F7E48EDB, 702353E0F7E48EDB hasn't been signed (publically
| >> known) by 5DDF8FB7688E31A6. It would be nice if the current key
| >> used
| >> to sign releases is also signed by the key previously used for
| >> that.
| >
| >I'll see how to do this (I haven't lost any keys, but hadn't thought
| >to connect these).
| 
| >One awkward problem with changing 5DDF8FB7688E31A6 is that its
| >associated email address has been defunct for quite a while.
| 
| PGP doesn’t care about eMail addresses – uids are mostly opaque.
| 
| $ gpg -u 5DDF8FB7688E31A6 --edit-key 702353E0F7E48EDB
| gpg> tsign
| […]
| gpg> save
| $ gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.surfnet.nl --send-keys 702353E0F7E48EDB

yes... but the registry which periodically asks for verification seems to care 
:-)

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]