[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme
From: |
Stefan Caunter |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2013 08:15:15 -0400 |
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Paul Gilmartin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2013-05-13, at 05:52, Klaus-Peter Wegge wrote:
>>
>> <a href="http://www.cenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=104:5:256312547600370">CENELEC
>> members</a>
>> alternative spelling:
>> <a
>> href="http://www.cenelec.eu/dyn/www/f%3Fp%3D104:5:256312547600370">CENELEC
>> members</a>
>>
>> Lynx message: "unsupported url scheme".
>>
> Somewhere in Lynx.trace I find:
>
> HTTP: Picked up location 'f?p=104:5:64816170326659'
> HTTP/1.1 302 Found
> HTAccess: status=399
> HTAccess: 'http://www.cenelec.eu/dyn/www/f?p=104:5:256312547600370' is a
> redirection URL.
> HTAccess: Redirecting to 'f?p=104:5:64816170326659'
> User message: Using f?p=104:5:64816170326659
>
> getfile: getting f?p=104:5:64816170326659
>
> HTParse: aName:`f?p=104:5:64816170326659'
> relatedName:`'
> want: host
> HTParse: result:`'
>
> Alert!: Unsupported URL scheme!
>
> -- gil
I saw that too, it's something that IIS7 is able to do, serve a page
that is a redirect with an internal alias, so the client sees a 200,
not a 304.
The served page is all javascript:
<body onload="getHash('dashsub');">
Seems CENELEC have standardized on a javascript website ;)
----
Stefan Caunter
CEO, ScaleEngine Inc.
"Streaming, CDN, and Internet Logistics"
E: address@hidden
Toronto: +1 647 459 9475
+1 800 224 0192
- Re: [Lynx-dev] 403 errors corrections?, Philip Webb, 2013/05/13
- [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, Klaus-Peter Wegge, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, Thorsten Glaser, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, David Woolley, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, Klaus-Peter Wegge, 2013/05/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, Klaus-Peter Wegge, 2013/05/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] unsupported URL scheme, Karen Lewellen, 2013/05/13