lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML5 meta charset attribute (fwd)


From: Karen Lewellen
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML5 meta charset attribute (fwd)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:59:10 -0400 (EDT)

Here was the discussion thread, or part of at.
in Oct.  2011, you were unsure when it would be added.
So I am now wondering if patch, which was provided in a post included in the same thread was incorporated.
Karen

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:21:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Dickey <address@hidden>
To: Karen Lewellen <address@hidden>
Cc: David Dorward <address@hidden>, lynx-dev listserv <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML5 meta charset attribute

On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, Karen Lewellen wrote:

 Agreed,
 if such can be incorporated now, not only does lynx become even more
 flexible than it already is, but such can raise the profile for lynx in
 general. Especially for those who want access to video but cannot manage it
 any other way.
 brings up a question, and forgive me if a baby one.
 When will the stable release be out, and will it incorporate this feature?
 Karen

2.8.8dev.10 - I'm not sure.  It's awkward since it's a small change...

Right now the programs demanding the most time are dialog and xterm. I have some changes that I'd like to make to lynx (display problems with the maximize feature added for win32), and have only gotten from outside just this one patch (there was a part of another patch...).

Usually what gets my attention is (a) big bug or (b) big patch.


 On Wed, 5 Oct 2011, David Dorward wrote:

>  On 5 Oct 2011, at 19:36, Keith Bowes wrote:
> > > Je 2011-Sep-29 je 19:09, KIHARA Hideto skribis:
> > >  Please support meta charset attribute of HTML5.
> > >   http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/semantics.html#the-meta-element
> > > > > > > Hm. Is it really worth being so concerned about this? Ian Hickson has
> >  said that the ETA of HTML5 final is 2022.  It just seems to me to be too
> >  much of a moving target to really worry about at this time.
> > > It is a stable part of the specification that is in pretty wide use today. > > -- > David Dorward
>  http://dorward.me.uk
> > > _______________________________________________
>  Lynx-dev mailing list
>  address@hidden
>  https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
> >
 _______________________________________________
 Lynx-dev mailing list
 address@hidden
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]