[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: support for data: URI scheme, please?

From: David Woolley
Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: support for data: URI scheme, please?
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:26:35 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20090812)

Thomas Dickey wrote:
    was encoded, be it XML, HTML, plain text, or whatever else.

I'm talking about the parsing of the tag (perhaps I'm not seeing how simple it is), as well as providing a stream for rendering (lynx's notion of that is a little crude).

The tag will be a normal anchor, frame, image, etc., start tag. It is just the attribute value that needs special handling.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]