Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: lynx2.8.7dev.2 distfile size/checksum mismatch

[Thomas Dickey]

On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Walter Ian Kaye wrote:

> At 05:17 p +0000 02/05/2007, Thorsten Glaser didst inscribe upon an 
> electronic papyrus:
>
> > Thomas Dickey dixit:
> >
> > > >  I get the 3188012b file too. Seems as if the distfile changed,
> > > >  but why? (NB: This is the nightmare of all porters and packagers.)
> > >
> > > I haven't touched it...
> >
> > Interesting. I'll see whether I can dig up the old distfile, or
> > rather, when, and then compare them.
> >
> > For now, just build with NO_CHECKSUM=Yes. Disclaimer: I did not
> > tell you that ;)
>
> Even if you did, I have no clue how to tell mmake that.
> Or how to clear out the current abnormal state, which should probably be done 
> first.
>
> Man, I miss Lynx. It's a vital part of how I use my Mac. I feel so 
> unproductive without it.

Why do you need the port?  It seems that it's just setting up useful
combinations of options.  (I do use ports - for programs that I'm 
not developing ;-)

--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net