[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Permissions of files installed by install-doc
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Permissions of files installed by install-doc |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:11:18 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 address@hidden wrote:
> In a recent note, Thomas Dickey said:
>
> > Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 12:00:00 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > ok (that's a nuisance). I should have noticed it before, since it's
> > been using tar for some time. At one point or another I've encountered
> > different flavors of tar which have different options controlling whether
> > the original ownership should be used. Rather than get deep into that
> > swamp, I guess a
> > -chown -R root $(DOCDIR)
> > will be enough for now.
> >
> ... but only if the installing user has privilege to do "chown".
yes.
> Worse yet, I do some installs on a system on which, because of a
> spoor-marking contest between the admins of the server and the admins
> of the client, I can "give away" files with "chown", then not chown
> them back, delete them, not modify them subsequently.
I haven't seen one of those for a while. Does it have 'id' (returning a
number), or are we stuck?
> > I've modified the configure check for 'tar' to allow other names, and was
> > just starting to test to ensure that I can use 'pax' and 'star' in that
> > place.
> >
> Of course, the command syntax for "pax" is significantly different from
> that of "tar".
Yes (I'm finding this - hadn't looked at pax for a long time, but
realizing that it is standard, have to include it).
For lynx we only need the equivalents for
tar xf -
tar cf -
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
Re: lynx-dev Permissions of files installed by install-doc, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/26