[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17
From: |
RobertM |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17 |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2004 15:34:09 +0000 (GMT) |
It is alleged that Thomas Dickey once typed:
[snip]
> The second parameter to getaddrinfo() could be the problem. Documentation
> says it is either a service name or a port number. 54321 is not one of
> the standard ports - perhaps the function cares about that. One of the
> pages I'm looking at uses "http" as an example. That would be fine for
> lynx - can you tweak the configure script and test that?
No joy with that, I'm technically at work so I can't fiddle too much
but just making that change didn't make things happy.
I'll try playing with just the failing test program tonight as that'll
be quicker than running ./configure all the time.
--
Robm
873
"Ask not what I can do for the stupid,
but what the stupid can do for me" - Graeme Garden
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/11
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, RobertM, 2004/01/11
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/11
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/11
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, RobertM, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, RobertM, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, RobertM, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/20
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17,
RobertM <=
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/21
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.5dev.17, Thomas Dickey, 2004/01/21