Re: lynx-dev time for 2.8.5 proper

[purslow]

031231 Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 address@hidden wrote:
>> it's high time there was a release called '2.8.5'.
> yes -

good!

> I originally had it in mind a year ago,
> but couldn't clean up for a release & deal with LP's patches.
> That's why I switched my process to incremental patches in June -
> to get rid of distractions.  Unfortunately that core dump in textarea
> has my attention since it's a new bug and is difficult to debug.
 
>> with many projects, the difference between '2.8.4' & '2.8.5'
>> wb the same as between present Lynxes '2.8.4.16' & '2.8.4.17'.
 
> agreed - if I don't get distracted by something else,
> I'll complete dev.17 during this week.

as i'm sure you realise, my point is re version-numbering,
not your careful & conscientious work on Lynx.

-- 
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|  Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT    `-O----------O---'  University of Toronto

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden