Re: lynx-dev new protocols

[Carlton Anderson]

--- Henry Nelson <address@hidden> wrote:
> >   BROWSER_EXEC:
> >   This would allow the user to give a named
> >   command to Lynx; ...
> 
> There are already so many ways to execute commands while running Lynx, e.g.,
> `!', `.', `D)ownload', `P)rint', mimecap, lynxcgi and pseudoproxies, that
> it's a virtual nightmare for someone running a public-access Lynx to go
> through and exercise all of them after a new release.  Unless we REALLY need,
> and I mean NEED, more protocols can we try to use what we've already got more
> efficiently?  TIA.
> 
> __Henry
> 

You are right. Most of the things I want to
do are already in Lynx. 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden