[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?
From: |
Matt Ackeret |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:39:12 -0700 (PDT) |
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, David Woolley wrote:
>> For this site to work properly, you must have JavaScript and Cookies
>> enabled on your web browser.
>
>I find it difficult to imagine that this site is not covered by Section 508,
>and I thought Section 508 required equivalent service without running
>programs on the client.
But doesn't Section 508 only cover sites/software that the *government*
does business with?
and even if it did violate, someone would have to sue them for compliance,
wouldn't they?
(Don't get me wrong, I often use(d) 508 as a rationale for making some keyboard
navigation thing work better... but that's for me to use optionally, not
my sole method of input..)
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Henry Nelson, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Martin McCormick, 2002/08/15
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Henry Nelson, 2002/08/16
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Martin McCormick, 2002/08/16
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, tg, 2002/08/17
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, pg, 2002/08/19