[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*? |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:37:21 +0500 (SAMST) |
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 10:03:45PM +0500, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > > > You should use a commandline option:
> > > >
> > > > links -g
> > > > to start it in X (and some other switch to start it with
> > > > SVGAlib).
> > > > Default mode is text mode.
> > >
> > > hmm (running links -g)
> >
> > I'm impressed by your ignorance of links :)
>
> no need - I've been very busy. And seeing 2.1pre's manpage begins with this
>
> links is a text mode WWW browser with ncurses interface,
> ^^^^^^^
> supporting colors, correct table rendering, background
> downloading, menu driven configuration interface and slim
> code.
>
> It goes on to claim that it recognizes file:// URLs which also is incorrect
> (I just checked that with 0.98 and 2.1pre).
Dunno, at least in the 'g' dialog file:// URLs work just fine in 2.0pre6.
> I tend to ignore the rest of the so-called documentation (I pointed that out
> more than once over the past few years - I see that 0.98 finally fixed that).
>
> The "-g" option isn't in the manpage anyway, and it appears that the way to
> determine what the program does is to read the source code...
Running 'links --help' spits out a usable help (mentioning '-g'), including
a list of keystrokes..
> > Nope, they embedded fonts into executable in order not to store them as
> > external files (MSish ways - all in one).
>
> ("reliable monolithic design")
>
> more apt:
>
> "beauty is only skin-deep"
:)
Best regards,
-Vlad
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, David Combs, 2002/08/08
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, clemens fischer, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/10
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?,
Vlad Harchev <=
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, clemens fischer, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Thomas Dickey, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Frédéric L . W . Meunier, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, clemens fischer, 2002/08/11
- Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, Vlad Harchev, 2002/08/11
Re: lynx-dev LYNX: hey, guys: Just what are we gonna *DO*?, James Phillips, 2002/08/10