[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 21:25:17 +0100 (BST) |
> Lynx-dev handles this by inviting all non-subscribers, or subscribers with
> other addresses from which they may post, to sub-scribe to:
That's the wrong way round. It is important that people who post
to the list are subscribed to the main list, otherwise they are likely
not to receive the replies to their own questions. The auxiliary list
is only useful for people reading the archives.
> As for the Majordomo 101 in your message, we poor simple moderators are now
> re-sending the messages with all the headers intact. I personally would
> value direct inquiry into the poster's environment over what's in the
So would I, but plug and play users are very bad at submitting good
reports.
> message headers, but if reading those tea leaves makes you happy, you've
> got 'em.
It doesn't just break reading between the lines, it means you can't
thread properly, you can't filter by sender and you don't have
even the reply all option for ensuring that the sender gets a copy.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, Fiber McGee, 2002/04/03
Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, Fiber McGee, 2002/04/03
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx,
David Woolley <=
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, Fiber McGee, 2002/04/04
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, clemensF, 2002/04/04
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, David Woolley, 2002/04/04
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, Miles O'Neal, 2002/04/04
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, clemensF, 2002/04/05
- Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx, clemensF, 2002/04/05
- Mailing list readership (was: Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx), Duncan Simpson, 2002/04/08
- Re: Mailing list readership (was: Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx), David Woolley, 2002/04/09
- Re: Mailing list readership (was: Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx), clemensF, 2002/04/09
- Re: Mailing list readership (was: Re: lynx-dev How to Lynx), Ian Collier, 2002/04/09