[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.20
From: |
pg |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.20 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:53:49 -0600 (MDT) |
In a recent note, Thomas Dickey said:
> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 21:03:56 -0400
>
> 2001-04-01 (2.8.4dev.20)
> * fix a comparison in HTChunkPutUtf8Char() to work with EBCDIC -PG
>
Thanks. Verified.
> * add configure --enable-vertrace option, to put __FILE__ and __LINE__ into
> trace log -PG
>
Thanks. When this didn't appear in dev.19 I feared it had been rejected,
either on its (lack of) merits, or because it conflicted with other Work In
Progress nearby. I know I had to re-integrate it to apply it to dev.19.
But I notice my comma-expression has been converted to a compound-statement.
Was the comma-expression too bizarre, or did it threaten portability?
I liked the comma-expression because I could put a CTRACE within an expression:
x = wombat ? (CTRACE((tfp,"First\n")), a) : (CTRACE((tfp,"Second\n")), b);
and it also avoids the syntax error if someone is so rash as to:
if (wombat)
CTRACE((tfp, "True\n"));
else
CTRACE((tfp, "False\n"));
> * fix a typo in LYCharUtils.c CTRACE macro, ...
>
Of course, it was the comma-expression that stumbled over this typo and
caused a syntax error, for better or worse.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.20, Thomas Dickey, 2001/04/04
Small build problem on cygwin (was Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.4dev.20), bomfog34, 2001/04/05