[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Oct 2000 15:40:47 -0400 |
001024 Thomas Heye wrote:
TD> I don't recall seeing many comments before (since it is simple to change,
HN> I'm not loud enough, I guess. :) NONE of the unessential "features"
HN> (=frivolous junk) should be compiled in by default, IMO.
HN> People who really want it should have to turn it on at compile time.
> But what IS 'unessential'? I think that's somehow a matter of taste.
> And (as far as I know) other browsers also indicate the download speed.
> If you turn that into a compile-time option,
> you'd also have to distribute different binary files
> there are many people who won't be willing to recompile the source code
> they just want to have a browser they can use and things they can adjust.
before the real issue gets lost -- even TD nods occasionally (smile) -- ,
we don't need to make `bytes/KB/none' a compile-time option,
only to add `none' to the existing options in lynx.cfg .
TD says it's easy & he now has two voices raised in favor.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Henry Nelson, 2000/10/23
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Karen Lewellen, 2000/10/24
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Henry Nelson, 2000/10/24
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Henry Nelson, 2000/10/25
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Karen Lewellen, 2000/10/26
Re: lynx-dev bytes sec?, Henry Nelson, 2000/10/26