[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz
From: |
Atsuhito Kohda |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jul 2000 09:36:18 +0900 |
From: Henry Nelson <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:35:19 +0900 (JST)
> > This sound nice but I choose an easier way about po, that is,
> > put new file into lynx*/po/ and leave everything to configure
> > script ;-)
>
> Perhaps then YOU would volunteer to write the docs/README.intl ;-)
Hmm, Henry, your writing is too rhetorical (or ironical?)
for me to understand.
As far as I undestand, you advised me not using lynx*/po but
maintaining pot files independently and it was a better way.
And I thought that if I have enough knowledge to maintain
pot files by myself then it might be a better way but because
I did not have enough knowledge on pot files so it was a difficult
way _for me_.
So I choose an easier way (for me!) to use lynx*/po and a configure
script of lynx even if it is not a better way.
Then why you conclude that "YOU would volunteer to write the
docs/README.intl" from the above my reasoning and/or what is the
real meaning of your sentence?
Regards, 2000.7.1
--
Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
Atsuhito Kohda <address@hidden>
Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, (continued)
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/27
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/28
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/28
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/28
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/30
- Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz,
Atsuhito Kohda <=
Re: lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.4dev.2.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 2000/06/30