[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Superscripts
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Superscripts |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:37:38 -0500 (CDT) |
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Philip Webb wrote:
> presumably `\305' is the code for `u^', as i vulgarly transliterate it
Sergei's original message was in charset=utf-8 character encoding.
I should not have replied to that like I did, quoting his UTF-8
character without transcoding and then labelling the whole thing with
bogus charset. Sorry for that.
To see lynx's best effort at rendering that character, you should have
saved his text to a file, and then should have told lynx about the
character encoding; in this case, probably simplest with:
lynx -assume_charset=utf-8 /whereever/saved-snippet.html
> > at the same time avoiding that "blah blah<SUP>&trade</SUP>." becomes
> ^^^^^^; (isn't it?)
The ';' is not necessary here, but advisable.
Klaus
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- lynx-dev Superscripts, Sergei Pokrovsky, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Klaus Weide, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Philip Webb, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Sergei Pokrovsky, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts,
Klaus Weide <=
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Klaus Weide, 2000/06/06
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Philip Webb, 2000/06/06
- Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Doug Kaufman, 2000/06/06
- lynx-dev About that one character... (was: Superscripts), Klaus Weide, 2000/06/07
Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Sergei Pokrovsky, 2000/06/05
Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Sergei Pokrovsky, 2000/06/07
Re: lynx-dev Superscripts, Sergei Pokrovsky, 2000/06/07
lynx-dev UTF-8 encoding questions (was: Superscripts), Klaus Weide, 2000/06/07