[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx
From: |
mattack |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Jun 2000 18:02:38 -0700 (PDT) |
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>theory. The simplest (in terms of least internal state) computer CPU I know of
>is the basic PDP-11, which has 8 16-bit general purpose registers (including
>the program counter and stack pointer) and a 16-bit processor status word.
>These registers constitute all of its internal state. But if you do the math,
Gee, I don't usually argue _for_ the simplicity of the 6502.. But it has
3 8 bit registers and a bunch of status bits.
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send "unsubscribe lynx-dev" to address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/04
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/05
- Re: lynx-dev Concerning the use of abort in the source of lynx, Michael Sokolov, 2000/06/05