[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch
From: |
pg |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2000 08:12:20 -0600 (MDT) |
In a recent note, Doug Kaufman said:
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 23:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
>
> difficult to make a binary portable between systems, since not all cp
> binaries will handle the cygwin drive letter syntax (e.g. the DJGPP cp
>
> +#if defined(DOSPATH) || defined(__CYGWIN__) /* thanks to Hiroyuki
> Senshu */
>
Is this done at the right place? Are there other uses of DOSPATH that
affect cygwin? Would it be better do define DOSPATH for cygwin compilation?
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
- lynx-dev cygwin patch, Doug Kaufman, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch,
pg <=
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Doug Kaufman, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Klaus Weide, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Doug Kaufman, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Philip Webb, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Bob Izenberg, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Doug Kaufman, 2000/04/30
- Re: lynx-dev cygwin patch, Philip Webb, 2000/04/30