Re: lynx-dev DJGPP2.03 and bugfix lib

[Doug Kaufman]

On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Klaus Peter Wegge wrote:

> > binutils 2.91 is recommended, but no precompiled binary package is
> Why is it recommended?

I think it has to do with better alignment, but I am out of my depth
here. See the discussions about binutils 2.91 on the djgpp and
djgpp-workers mailing lists.

> I have found a binary version at http://www.goof.com/pcg/data/djgpp
> but is rather old (1998).

That wasn't compiled with DJGPP 2.03. I wouldn't recommend mixing
versions.

> Searching at DJGPP home page for the sources and your patch delivered
> no results. Can you provide me please with some more details or 
> directly with sources and the patch?

The patch is at:
"http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/1999/08/24/15:14:36";
  
> I just started on openssl intergration for DJGPP lynx. But it seems
> to be rather difficult. I'll continue work and tell you more about
> the works progress.

Thanks. I'll be interested.
                            Doug
__ 
Doug Kaufman
Internet: address@hidden