[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Jan 100 10:55:13 -0500 (EST) |
>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 100, T.E.Dickey wrote:
>
> >[...]
> > > As for HTMLSRC_*:blah-blah it was choosen the best name PRETTYSRC_SPEC::
> > > since it deals with -prettysrc and assume something "special":))
> > > could we interpret `spec' this way also?
> >
> > (will see what response this gets)
>
> I don't understand what you, Tom and Leonid, are talking about. What do you
> mean by "interpretting 'spec' this way"?
I wasn't sure (and it did not sound like a definite proposal, so I am looking
at the responses).
> Best regards,
> -Vlad
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/09
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, rjp, 2000/01/09
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/09
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/09
- Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/10
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, Leonid Pauzner, 2000/01/15
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, T.E.Dickey, 2000/01/08
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg,
T.E.Dickey <=
Re: lynx-dev dev.18 patch: USE_PRETTYSRC, lynx.cfg, T.E.Dickey, 2000/01/15