[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.18
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.18 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 100 06:57:41 -0500 (EST) |
> > offhand (on my list) the email configuration,
>
> is this the recent discussion re calling up one's favorite e-mailer?
> my vote is to have such a facility, if it is feasible.
yes (if it's simple & doesn't lead into revisions - I really haven't done
more than glance at those patches)
> -- snip --
> > 2000-01-06 (2.8.3dev.18)
> -- snip --
> > * modify LYsetXDisplay() to permit $DISPLAY to have an empty value
> > and reuse logic in forms-options from menu-options
> > as validate_x_display() and summarize_x_display().
>
> can we please ALWAYS use the agreed terminology,
> ie `form-based options' & `key-based options' (frown)?
> this sentence also seems to be syntax-challenged.
ok (maybe we need a glossary ;-)
> SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey