[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, pleas
From: |
Vlad Harchev |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:37:47 +0400 (SAMT) |
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Vlad Harchev wrote:
>
> > OK. I don't insist on names of any psrc-related options (but I don't want
> > to
> > do renaming myself) - do this if you wish :)
>
> Yea, that's the trouble with you.
>
> Look at the subject line - the request is still there, just as you put
> it. Now you act like it's not your business, like you never asked.
I asked for inventing new name of the option that will replace HTMLSRC_*
stuff used for "stylesheet definition". HTMLSRC_*_XFORM were not in my plans.
I said that Tom should choose the best name and modify patch to reflect that
name before applying it. I think that this will be very easy for Tom.
>
> > Nobody posted a request to explain more about psrc stylesheets, their
> > syntax
> > and use. I treat this as "nobody has problems reading description" :)
>
> I just did.
But seems you know everything about them, so you don't count :-)
> A style for <NOTE> with a configurable string ("Note:", or "",
> something completely different). A style for <IMG> with "Image:" or
> "[IMAGE]" and so on. Those are the kind of thing I was thinking of.
Yes, ability to specify such things would be good.
You'd better to give more verbose examples, like "<b>Note</b>" - ie put
everything together (if you did, I would understood you immediately). Using
entities (for repersenting some funny symbols that are in Unicode) would be
nice too.
> As I said, it doesn't make too much sense for -prettysrc source
> viewing. But you implemented that (not exactly trivial)
> associate-a-lexeme-with- some-markup stuff. Seems to me that could be
> used in some kind of stylesheet way for "real" text, not just for
> source colorization. Just a vague feeling. But it might be a pity
> to let that effort be wasted on only source prettifying.
Yes, something more powerful (with ability to insert text) would be useful.
But IMO we could extend syntax of my mini-HTML to allow text, ie
span.my_style "!" !span b i "text" !b !i
- ie text is in double quotes, quotes could be escaped using a slash. The
use of that syntax disallows any abuses, IMO.
And you are right, I didn't have anything in mind except psrc when inventing
the syntax for psrc stylesheet.
> > Klaus, IMO we should concentrate on something else (eg table rendering).
>
> How about, documenting what's there in an understandable way.
OK, I will do this (documentation) later, when I'll have time. But seems
nobody tried to understand that documentation - that upsets me.
Best regards,
-Vlad
- lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Leonid Pauzner, 2000/01/04
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/05
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/06
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/06
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Vlad Harchev, 2000/01/06
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please, Klaus Weide, 2000/01/06
- Re: lynx-dev removing HTMLSRC_* stuff: suggest a new setting name, please,
Vlad Harchev <=