[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 10:24:35 +0000 (GMT) |
> If 1), I don't think there is anything to forbid charging for the source
> "based on the value of the source itself". Whatever that [value of the
> source itself] means. If you disagree, please show where it's written.
Others have pointed out clause 3b.
The value of the source means "what the market will bear", which can,
sometimes, exceed the cost of re-developing from scratch..
- lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, TWG, 1999/12/16
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, T.E.Dickey, 1999/12/16
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, David Woolley, 1999/12/18
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, Klaus Weide, 1999/12/18
- [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], Klaus Weide, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], Klaus Weide, 1999/12/18
- Re: [OT?] Charging for source [was: Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version], brian j pardy, 1999/12/18
- Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version,
David Woolley <=
Re: lynx-dev Lynxon Win32 - wireless version, David Woolley, 1999/12/18