lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.17


From: Vlad Harchev
Subject: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.17
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:17:24 +0400 (SAMT)

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:

> >  As other say, no .lynxrc option exists for it. It should be saved 
> > somewhere,
> > and I don't insist on lynx.cfg at all.
> 
> Whew!  Glad to hear that.

  The need of saving options is so obvious..
 
> > > "feature" itself.  All it does for me in its present form is 1) take away
> > > 2 lines of information that I want on the Visited Page, 2) when I try to
> > > change back to a regular list, after pressing enter on the accept changes
> > > I am thrown back to the page I was viewing before rather than a revised
> > > Visited Page, and 3) it just keeps moving the visited links more and more
> > > to the right so that long ones quickly have to be wrapped (making them
> > > harder to read AND wasting more space).  To me it is worthless and I don't
> > > want it, but there is no way for me to turn it off.  Why do I have to be
> > > the one to create and maintain a backout patch?
> > 
> >  1) For Tree mode, those 2 lines added are not visible since page is 
> > scrolled
> 
> ?  Below is the out-of-the-box Visited Links Page.  I'm talking about that
> "   [View As Visit Tree___________] Accept Changes" line and the following
> blank line.
> 
>                                                              Visited Links 
> Page
> 
>                 Visited Links Page (Lynx$B%P!<%8%g%s(J 2.8.3dev.16)
> 
>    [View As Visit Tree___________] Accept Changes
> 
> You visited (POSTs, bookmark, menu and list files excluded):
> 0. [1]
>   ***** snipped ********
> ==>     5. [6]NoxWeeds Project List
>            http://endeavor.des.ucdavis.edu/weeds/specieslist.asp

 Of course I understand what lines you meant. I said that if your session
lasts some time and you've visited a lot of files in the session, VLP will
occupy several pages. Currently selected link will be the one that corresponds
to documend opened recently - so last link on the VLP will be current (at
least for Tree mode) - this means that VLP will be scrolled to the last page 
so you won't see 2 lines you are talking about.
 
> >  3) This seems a problem, but for Tree mode only. I don't know how to fix
this
> 
> That's what I mean!  Who needs it?

 It's easier to fix it than remove this feature. At least this doesn't harm
you I guess - seems you don't use Tree Mode.

 Your "who needs it?" could be treated as "everybody thinks it's useless".
 If yes then how did you get this info?

> > hope that you won't be willing to do so that much when all problems listed
> > will be fixed.
> 
> _If_ and _when_, we'll see.
>  
> > > I also am very much opposed to allowing the Visited Page posting (writing
> > > to disk) privileges.
> > 
> >   I see this as useless feature too (but I'd like to be able to have much 
> > more
>                   ^^^^^^^
> I'm not saying "useless."  In this case I am specifically saying 
> _undesirable_.

 Seems that I misunderstood something when posting this note (Seems I was
thinking about special support for VLP page - ie that VLP page is saved on
exit, loaded at startup and that new entries are appended to it). Now I wish 
to correct my POV: I haven't saved my VLP (ie didn't use ability to save VLP), 
but disabling the ability to save VLP seems useless for me.
  
> > bookmark files than 26, so I won't have to invent one-letter association for
> > bookmark files. Having implemented ability for adding (and probably
> > deleting) links to/from arbitrary files will allow user to save favorite 
> > links
> > from his/her session to some file - IMO 95% of links in the V.L. page would 
> > b
> 
> I don't really understand your point here.  What I do is 'a' => 'l' with
> the Visited Page, though in my case I would say that is closer to 99.9% of
> the links are useless/redundant.  All of my bookmark files are hand-edited
> except for one "pending" bookmark that is left stock so Lynx can do erasures
> safely, so I have the use of ul nesting and links to sub-bookmarks on disk,
> granted Lynx can't use them directly.

 Of course anything could be done manually...
 
> __Henry
> 

 Best regards,
  -Vlad


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]