[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev bug report
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev bug report |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 1999 04:21:46 +0400 (MSD) |
22-Jul-99 17:03 Perry Wagle wrote:
> In the lynx source that comes with redhat 5.2 and 6.0, in the file
I have no idea what lynx versions RedHat ships
but this problem already fixed nearly a year ago.
1998-10-24 (2.8.1rel.1)
-----------------------
* correct uninitialized index into id_append in makeuctb, which causes problems
with def7_uni.tbl (analysis by LP)
> lynx2-8-1/src/chrtrans/makeuctb.c, line 654 is:
> id_append[i+1] = '\0';
> in the context:
> if (this_isDefaultMap == 1) {
> *id_append = '\0';
> } else {
> for (i = 0, p = this_MIMEcharset;
> *p && (i < UC_MAXLEN_ID_APPEND-1);
> p++, i++) {
> id_append[i+1] = isalnum(*p) ? *p : '_';
> }
> }
> id_append[i+1] = '\0';
> fprintf(stderr, " (%s).\n", id_append);
> which means that if this_isDefaultMap == 1, then "i" is not initialized. In
> my case, "i == 256", way beyond the bounds of the array.
> The new stackguard compiler permutes memory enough to cause this to cause
> printf to segfault while dynamically loading during first invocation.
> I patched this by moving the errant assignment up into the else clause of the
> if:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** src/chrtrans/makeuctb.c~ Sat Sep 26 20:28:34 1998
> --- src/chrtrans/makeuctb.c Thu Jul 22 17:05:40 1999
> ***************
> *** 651,656 ****
> id_append[i+1] = isalnum(*p) ? *p : '_';
> }
> }
> - id_append[i+1] = '\0';
> fprintf(stderr, " (%s).\n", id_append);
> --- 651,656 ----
> id_append[i+1] = isalnum(*p) ? *p : '_';
> }
> + id_append[i+1] = '\0';
> }
> fprintf(stderr, " (%s).\n", id_append);
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- Perry Wagle (address@hidden)
- lynx-dev bug report, Perry Wagle, 1999/07/22
- Re: lynx-dev bug report,
Leonid Pauzner <=
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/22
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Perry Wagle, 1999/07/22
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/22
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23
- Re: lynx-dev bug report, Frederic L. W. Meunier, 1999/07/23