Re: lynx-dev lynx 2.8.2dev24 + ssl

[dickey]

> 
> No, because i'm too lazy (and donkey) to learn ssl.  I jus think that i'm
> not the only one (most of you want this, right?) and making a patch isn't
> too hard if you maintain and don't make it only for the rel versions. 
> OK, lynx with ssl isn't too important to me.  I'll live without this. 
> But just a question:  i made something wrong or this patch (for
> 2.8.1rel2) will not work with 2.8.2devs?  []'s

I have a resync from a few dev's ago:

http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey/lynx/patches/lynx2.8.2dev.17-ssl.patch.gz

If there's problems with that, I'll revisit it.
  
> > Ah - it seems you DO know why one isn't made available for all versions -  
> > it [is] a hard work... 
> >  
> > Lynx patches occur when volunteers step forward to do just that - 
> > are you volunteering to maintain the SSL patches? 

not I (I don't use the result myself)


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey