[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx documentation (was Re: lynx-dev HTML 4.0 (was Commenting... ))
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx documentation (was Re: lynx-dev HTML 4.0 (was Commenting... )) |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 1999 12:21:06 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:18:13AM -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
> > Michael Sobolev wrote:
> > > Finally I found that the documentation is incomplete. :)
> >
> > a common occurrence ...
> Sure. :)
>
> > health warning: trying to improve Lynx documentation can be painful.
> Yes, that should be.
>
> BTW, can anybody tell how the documentation of lynx is usually modified?
> A lot of features get added, and then, one day, documentation is brought
> up-to-date, or every added feature gets immediately documented?
some people document as they go along, some don't.
All of the interesting changes should be reflected in 'CHANGES'.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx documentation (was Re: lynx-dev HTML 4.0 (was Commenting... )),
dickey <=