Re: lynx-dev dead code & 2-8-2

[dickey]

> i'ld say -- subject to correction by others in the consensus -- 
> that you should create a set of patches now -- while you have time -- 
> based on 2-8-2dev.19 , which is likely to be close enough to 2-8-2rel.1 , 
...
> but NBB: they must be PATCHES, not rationales or lists of functions etc: 
> in real lynx-dev life, no-one else will put in the labor 
> to convert them from the latter to the former: 

true (if it doesn't look like a patch, I'll overlook it).
  
> SUPPORT     ___________//___,  Philip Webb : address@hidden 

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey