Re: lynx-dev next/prev relative number command suffixes

[Henry Nelson]

> Ok, here's a patch that implements the following:
>
>  n[+|-][p|P|g|G]
>
> where n is a decimal number. (Note: the old 123g/123p/123 behavior is
> unchanged.)

Any chance of a patch to make this and "the old 123g/123p/123 behavior"
a compile-time option? It would be a good precedence for authors of
invaluable features (but features nonetheless).

__Henry