[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev bloating binaries (was clue)
From: |
Philip Webb |
Subject: |
lynx-dev bloating binaries (was clue) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:22:34 -0500 (EST) |
990223 Henry Nelson wrote:
> ALL recent "features" should be off by default.
> Definitely, all "features" should have compiletime options.
> When something can't be turned off, it requires delving into the code.
agreed here: have there been exceptions to this?
> Lynx is getting way too big.
> Lynx is no longer a valid option on a limited resource machine.
> The real problem is that the code only grows. In the last two years,
> I don't recall the binary being smaller than the previous one.
my 2-8-1rel.1 binary is 1,45 M , 2-8-2dev.17 is 1,53 M (both stripped).
i don't understand why, tho' it seems to be chartrans stuff.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : address@hidden
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
- lynx-dev dev17 clue?, Philip Webb, 1999/02/17
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, posterkid, 1999/02/17
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/22
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, dickey, 1999/02/23
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, dickey, 1999/02/23
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, Bela Lubkin, 1999/02/23
- Re: lynx-dev dev17 clue?, Henry Nelson, 1999/02/23