[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lynx-dev Re: keeping lynx in sync with gettext
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
Subject: |
lynx-dev Re: keeping lynx in sync with gettext |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Feb 1999 11:44:31 -0800 |
On Fri, Feb 05, 1999, address@hidden (address@hidden) said:
|
| (sorry - my keyboard bounced on the previous message when I was saving).
Heh. I usually blame the cat ... :-) ...!
| not exactly - I'd like to get rid of tfp as a parameter. Changing the
| macro syntax would help flush out the change (because the ones that I
| may miss wouldn't compile).
As long as folks are talking about revising the trace macros, would it
be possible to add a fflush() after each fprintf() call ...?
It is most annoying to be zeroing in on a problem, only to find out that
the data you need is still in an i/o buffer, because you stupidly forgot
to explicitly add a CTRACE_FLUSH() yourself.
Shouldn't be a performance issue, since when tracing is on, that's really
not what one is concerned with.
/kim
- Re: lynx-dev keeping lynx in sync with gettext, (continued)