[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what
From: |
Greg Marr |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:05:16 -0400 |
>on this system, i cannot change the permission of my symlink in /tmp :
>i tried it both from /homes/purslow & from /tmp & was told:
>"Cannot access /tmp/dagger : permission denied".
You can not change the permission of a symlink. Attempting to change the
permission of a symlink really attempts to change the permission of the file
that the symlink points to.
>if the symlink permission is not observed by the system,
>i wonder why i am denied permission to change its permissions:
You're trying to change the permission of the file it points to, which
presumably you don't own.
>it looks very much like a simple security device
>to prevent the kind of abuses we are discussing
Nope.
>(BTW is this the `sticky bit' at work? i need reminding what that does).
No, the sticky bit prevents user A from deleting user B's file from a
world-writable directory.
>further, there appears to be no good reason for UNIX generally
>not to observe symlink permissions:
Yes there is.
>for the kinds of case
>you & others describe, where one user uses another's .rc file,
>the owner can make it 705 , while the other user's symlink's 700
>-- matching the practice on this system -- is adequate for his needs.
If it honored the permission 700 on the symlink, he'd be able to write to
other
people's files just by making symlinks to them.
--
Greg Marr
address@hidden
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, David Combs, 1998/10/10
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, Bela Lubkin, 1998/10/11
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, Bela Lubkin, 1998/10/11
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, dickey, 1998/10/11
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, dickey, 1998/10/11
- Re: lynx-dev Re: who owns what, Bela Lubkin, 1998/10/11