lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

lynx-dev LYNX: idea for "L"-page: add the "title", too.


From: David Combs
Subject: lynx-dev LYNX: idea for "L"-page: add the "title", too.
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 11:07:19 -0700 (PDT)

The lynx "L"-page is really cool.  Often, when the index page
is hard to read for scanning for interesting articles, I
just do a "L", and choose from THAT (lynx) page:

                                                                                
                                List Page (p1 of 4)
     
                                                List Page (Lynx Version 
2.8.1pre.8)
     
   References in http://www.american-politics.com/indexnext.html
     
     * [1]American Politics Journal
     * [2]http://www.american-politics.com/index.html
     * [3]http://www.american-politics.com/helpus.html
     * [4]http://www.american-politics.com/subNEW.html
     * [5]http://www.american-politics.com/todaysdailycomment.html
     * [6]in American Politics Journal - Links
     * [7]mailto:address@hidden
     * [8]http://www.american-politics.com/Gelken.html
     * [9]http://www.american-politics.com/Corn.html
     * [10]http://www.american-politics.com/MacArthur.html
     * [11]http://www.american-politics.com/editorialbydate.html
     * [12]http://www.american-politics.com/docspage.html
     * [13]in American Politics Journal - Search American Politics
     * [14]http://www.american-politics.com/gallery.html
     * [15]http://www.american-politics.com/PunditPap.html
     * [16]http://www.american-politics.com/winatrip.html
 ...


---------

Now, for THAT purpose (replacement for the site's own index
page, as something to browse quickly by eye),
it would be EVEN COOLER (to reuse a word I used above) if this
"L"-display had (or optionally could have) the TITLES displayed out
to the right.

Since the titles wouldn't be (on my screen) BLACK (as are the links),
your eye wouldn't be slowed down when looking at just the link-addresses
themselves.

What say?  Anyone like this idea?  (And my just-prior one, too?)

David

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]