[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate
From: |
Larry W. Virden |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 1998 08:15:57 -0400 |
From: Philip Webb <address@hidden>
> [ to remind everyone where we got to ]
> today, i suggest there are 2 things to do.
>
> first, i'm prepared to make my case to the authors of HTML 4.0
> that they should amend their recommendations for <BR> in HTML 4.1 .
That seems like a good start. However, if you cannot convince them, then
my vote is for lynx to stick to it's current behavior as default and
perhaps offer an option for your proposed behavior.
> second, Lynx should now adopt the above behaviour in anticipation
> & because we should try to make Lynx genuinely useful for ordinary users.
We anxiously await your implementation of the code.
> generally, people who draw up sets of rules for other people to follow
> need to have some sanction at back of them or they're wasting their time.
Having source code implementation of what they mean also helps.
> HTML OTOH has no sanction of any kind, esp given the anarchy of cyberspace,
I am uncertain what you are trying to convey here.
If by this you mean there are no 'net police' ready to arrest someone
who violates the standards, then I agree that no sanction exists. If however
you are saying that the W3C is not the formal standards setting body for
HTML, then I would disagree.
> so can we change the Lynx default to not collapse <BR><BR>
where I assume "we" means "when you provide the code, will TD
put it into the lynx source tree"?
> -- & perhaps add the feature that additional <BR>'s will be collapsed --
> & can someone -- AG ? -- tell me how to contact the HTML authors?
The HTML authors are at www.w3c.org . Go to that web site and you will
find the details of entering the newsgroup/mailing list/forum whatever it
is where HTML standards are discussed.
--
Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
<URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
- lynx-dev Bug Report, L.D. Abraham, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev Bug Report, Philip Webb, 1998/08/12
- lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Al Gilman, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Philip Webb, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Dave Eaton, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Philip Webb, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Al Gilman, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Philip Webb, 1998/08/13
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate,
Larry W. Virden <=
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, T.E.Dickey, 1998/08/14
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/08/14
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Philip Webb, 1998/08/15
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Dave Eaton, 1998/08/12
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, David Woolley, 1998/08/14
- Re: lynx-dev <BR> does not accumulate, Al Gilman, 1998/08/12