[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:25:46 -0400 (EDT) |
> Sure, that is what we all do now. However, it is not the same
> thing has having the variables named in such a way that it is
> immediately obvious if a chunk of code references local variables or
> global variables. Also, tags will not help you if a local variable is
> named `more' and a global variable is also called `more'.
It wouldn't help, except that I've gotten rid of these cases (shadowed
variables), at least on the platforms where I build with gcc.
> --JOhn
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, John E. Davis, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, T.E.Dickey, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, David Combs, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, John E. Davis, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, John E. Davis, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx,
T.E.Dickey <=
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, John E. Davis, 1998/04/27
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, David Combs, 1998/04/28
- Re: lynx-dev cleaning up lynx, John E. Davis, 1998/04/28