[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev build problems with 2.8
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev build problems with 2.8 |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 1998 08:44:33 -0400 (EDT) |
>
> From: Ric Anderson <address@hidden>
>
> >2. The file protections on ./configure and the scripts it calls (e.g.,
> > mkdirs.sh) do not include the execute bit in the tar file, so
> > you have to manually chmod these things (I'm still not sure I've
> > found all of them) to "+x" in order to successfully run configure
> > in the manner described in the INSTALLATION file.
>
> Anyone know how that version on ukans.edu was created? Ric's right - while
> the version I fetched from the regular development site has the right
> permissions, the one fetched from ukans is missing permissions. Let
> me check prep's version... the version from GNU directories has the right
> permissions! There's quite a bit of difference between the two tar files -
> at least in the order of files in the tar, etc.
Well, yes: unless you construct the tar file from an explicit list, it
will use directory-order, which isn't necessarily the order you would
expect. Since previous versions of Lynx were released w/o a tar file,
I didn't make one - but I just put that on the release page now, so we have
something to compare.
> For the time being, I recommend folk either get the version from the GNU
> archives, or even better, get the latest official revision from slcc.edu .
> --
> Larry W. Virden INET: address@hidden
> <URL:http://www.teraform.com/%7Elvirden/> <*> O- "We are all Kosh."
> Unless explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this posting should
> be construed as representing my employer's opinions.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey